When a single genetic mutation first let ancient Europeans drink milk, it set the stage for a continental upheaval.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Salque, M. et al. Nature 493, 522–525 (2013).
Leonardi, M., Gerbault, P., Thomas, M. G. & Burger, J. Int. Dairy J. 22, 88–97 (2012).
Gerbault, P. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 863–877 (2011).
Itan, Y., Powell, A., Beaumont, M. A., Burger, J. & Thomas, M. G. PLoS Comp. Biol. 5, e1000491 (2009).
Bersaglieri, T. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 1111–1120 (2004).
Vigne, J.-D. in The Neolithic Demographic Transition and its Consequences (eds Bocquet-Appel, J.-P. & Bar-Yosef, O.) 179–205 (Springer, 2008).
Edwards, C. J. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1377–1385 (2007).
Bramanti, B. et al. Science 326, 137–140 (2009).
Evershed, R. P. et al. Nature 455, 528–531 (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Related links
Related links
Related links in Nature Research
Pottery shards put a date on Africa’s dairying 2012-Jun-20
Ancient DNA solves milk mystery 2007-Feb-26
Human evolution: How Africa learned to love the cow 2006-Dec-21
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Curry, A. Archaeology: The milk revolution. Nature 500, 20–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/500020a
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/500020a
ExplorerMan
I think an equally interesting question that may shed some light on why lactose tolerance arose when and how it did is why didn't it arise MUCH SOONER in our evolution, since it is opens up a very nutritious food source?
I suspect the answer is so that in times of hunger, if the adult population can't drink milk, a mother's' milk would only by consumed by a child, therefore providing protection from very hungry adults. Since this adult intolerance would also prevent adults from consuming milk of other animals, then it's likely that the evolutionary advantage of protecting an infant's food source was greater than the advantage conferred by having the ability to consume any animals milk into adulthood.
So what changed to cause this to flip? Is it possible the domestication of cows, camels, goats, water buffalo, etc. provided a more reliable source of milk from other animals to make adult tolerance more advantageous? And/Or that religious belief provided moral prohibitions strong enough to protect infants (and their food source) in times of hunger to allow for lactose tolerance in adults to become more advantageous over the long term.