What is it that Musharraf was doing and Zardari is not? Didn’t Zardari say: 1) He had no interest in becoming Prime Minister or President. 2) He will remove 58-2 on the first day of his president 3) We will get rid of 17th Amendment. And that 4) There is no deal with America. Why Musharraf had to go and Zardari to stay for perpetuating the same crimes which are surely leading to the demise of Pakistan as an independent state on the world map?

Pakistan has been the high value target since 1970s, when Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto vowed that Pakistanis would eat grass but make sure it has a nuclear bomb. The CIA backed the so-called Islamic parties and launched a movement for implementation of Shari'ah in Pakistan. This led to the overthrow of Bhutto government and Zia's dictatorship which played a key role in the US-Jihad against the Soviet Union. Soon after the Soviet withdrawal, the eyes were focused on establishing a US satellite state in Afghanistan. For that reason, Taliban were groomed and put in power. When they failed to play the role expected of them, operation 9/11 was launched to establish bases in Afghanistan as a part of imploding Pakistan from within.

Since 2003 the war on Pakistan and the war within Pakistan is being gradually intensified in various ways, such as supporting tyrannical regimes, making them invade parts of their own country, helping the ISI establish local Abu Graib and Gruantanamos, training and sending terrorists from Afghanistan, launching attacks on Pakistan army through fake Taliban, supporting local 'jihad' against the puppet regime in Islamabad, false flag operations in India and Afghanistan and blaming those on Pakistan and of course the war drums in the media

The softening up of Pakistan is now reaching the final phases. All one needs to do is look at the history of this war on Pakistan to understand what is coming up and what could be done to peacefully resolve the situation and keep the powers at bay which are bent on balkanizing the region.