|
History
of wine
Georgia: Homeland of Winemaking and Viticulture
P. E. McGovern
University of Pennsylvania Museum
It has long been claimed that the earliest �wine culture� in
the world emerged in the mountainous regions of Transcaucasia--modern
Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan--during the Neolithic period (ca. 8500-4000
B.C.). The wild Eurasian grape sub-species (Vitis vinifera sylvestris) still
thrives at higher elevations in this region, with its well-drained
calcareous hills and valleys, its iron-rich terra rossa loam, and moderate
rainfall. Indeed, the greatest genetic variability of Vitis vinifera is to
be found in these upland regions, which very often denotes the �world
center� of a plant and where it is most likely to have been taken into
domestication.
Permanent Neolithic communities had been established in Transcaucasia by at
least 6000 B.C., and other essential preconditions (e.g., pottery-making)
for the momentous innovation of domesticating the grape and making wine on a
larger scale also came together for the first time in human history. Once
viniculture had taken hold here, it appears to have radiated out to other
parts of the Near East and eventually to Europe and the New World.
Supporting this contention, the proto-Indo-European root for �wine,� from
which the modern Indo-European, Semitic, and Slavic words are all derived,
is believed to have had its origin in the Transcaucasus.
The earliest Neolithic evidence for the beginnings of a true wine culture,
in which wine dominated social and economic life, comes from Georgia.
Shulaveris-Gora, south of Tbilisi, has yielded what may well be the oldest
"domesticated" grape pips (Vitis vinifera vinifera), dating from the early
6th millennium B.C. The domesticated vine�s main advantage over the wild
type is that it is self-pollinating, thus enabling it to produce a larger
and more predictable fruit crop. Besides selecting plants that yielded
larger, juicier, and tastier fruit with fewer seeds, the early Neolithic
horticulturalist also discovered how to �clone� the grapevine by rooting and
grafting branches.
The invention of pottery during the Neolithic period was crucial for
processing, serving, and storing wine. Again, 6th millennium B.C. sites in
Georgia--Shulaveri and Khramis-Didi-Gora--have yielded the earliest, most
important evidence. Jars, with reddish residues on their interiors (wine
lees?), were decorated with exterior appliqu�s which appear to be grape
clusters and jubilant stick-figures, with arms raised high, under grape
arbors.
The importance of viniculture in Georgian life only seems to have
intensified in later periods, finding new cultural expressions. For example,
impressive and unique artifacts characterize the so-called Trialeti culture
of the early 2nd millennium B.C. Large burial mounds (kurgans) at Trialeti
itself, west of modern Tblisi, and other sites of the period have yielded
marvelously ornate gold and silver goblets, often depicting drinking scenes
or ceremonies. Grapevine cuttings were even encased in silver, accentuating
the intricate nodal pattern of the plant. The latter specimens, with their
nearly 4000-year-old wood still intact, are on exhibit, together with
several Trialeti goblets, in the treasury room of the Georgian State Museum.
In parts of Georgia today, especially in the Kakheti and Rioni regions, wine
is still made in the traditional way by fermenting it, sometimes for several
years, in large jars (kwevris) buried up to their necks underground or in
artificially created hillocks of multiple kwevris (maranis). While the
earliest instance of this tradition can be traced back to the Iron Age (8th-
7th c. B.C.), numerous maranis of the Roman and Byzantine periods have been
excavated. Wine production continued unabated after the country�s conversion
to Christianity and throughout medieval times, which was partly assured by
the centrality of wine in the Eucharist. Yet, as any modern visitor to
Georgia will discover, secular life is permeated by wine conventions: hardly
a meal passes without the host assuming the role of toastmaster (tamada).
Long-standing traditions of cultivating the grapevine itself are reflected
in the numerous, modern red and white grapevine varieties, with such exotic
names as Saperavi and Rkatsiteli, whose origins might well go back to the
Neolithic period. Prof. Revaz Ramishvili, the head of the Georgian
Agricultural University�s viticultural institute, identified the
domesticated grape pips at Shulaveri. Both he and his father were pioneers
in the botanical study of the Eurasian grape. An intermediate type between
the wild and domesticated varieties, first identified by and named for the
elder Ramishvili, attests to Georgia�s crucial role in domestication of the
plant.
DNA analysis of modern Georgian cultivated Eurasian grapevines s have
already established that some of the Georgian varietals (e.g., Maglari
Tvrina and Otskhanuri Sapere) are closest to several important varietals of
Western Europe, including Pinor Noir, Syrah, and Nebbiolo. This finding
implies that the so-called �Noah hypothesis,� which posits an initial
domestication event in the mountainous Near Eastern region (eastern Taurus,
northwestern Zagros, and Caucasus Mountains), might well have occurred in
Georgia. More research is necessary, comparing modern vines from other
regions that have thus far not been sampled (especially Azerbaijan and
northwestern Iran).
On a recent trip to Georgia in September-October 2008, through the kind
auspices of David Lordkipanidze of the National Museum and the antiquities
department, I was able to collect crucial, additional samples of ancient
wood from the silver-covered Trialeti grapevines. Together with seeds from
Shulaveri, we now have the means to carry out a more definitive ancient DNA
study, as extraction and analytical methods improve.
Early Neolithic pottery from on-going excavations at Gadachrili, dated to
ca. 6000-5700 B.C., was also sampled. Because it was not subjected to a
concentrated hydrochloric acid treatment, it should produce more definitive
chemical results than samples already tested from Shulaveri and
Khramis-Didi-Gora. Preliminary findings from the latter already point toward
the presence of tartaric acid/tartrate, the biomarker for grape and wine in
the Middle East, inside the Neolithic jars. If substantiated by powerful
chemical techniques (viz., liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry),
Georgia�s impact on human civilization will have been shown to be very
significant and far-reaching, so much so that it might aptly be called the
�Cradle of Winemaking.� |