1) Please introduce yourself to the readers (how you started in the profession, education, credentials, experience, etc.).
Hi readers! My name is Justin Pollard and, as I think many of you know, I'm a pretty big college swimming fan. I graduated from Cal (also known as UC Berkeley) in 2009 so I do have a bias for the blue and gold, but in general I appreciate fast swimming no matter the location. I was fortunate enough to swim for the Golden Bears from 2004 through 2008 (the best 4 years of my life so far) and still follow the team closely (usually you can find me at both the Pac-10 championship and NCAAs).
Up until recently, I had no experience in web creation, programming, scripting, or anything computer related. However, when the law firm for which I currently work asked me to write a simple computer program for them, I took a great interest in the world of computer programming. I've read a couple books on the subject (usually stopping half way as I get caught up in the actual practice of the subject), but that's about it. My conclusion: anyone with a desire can program (or script as some purists may call it).
As a somewhat constant peruser of collegeswimming.com , I would often read gripes concerning the CSCAA poll, its subjectivity, etc. That led me to think "well if you all are so smart, then you do it!". Thus, theFastWater.com was born, allowing fans the ability to vote on which teams they thought were the best. Of course, I've also included an automatically created virtual NCAA meet to rank the best teams on how they would score at NCAA's if it took place today.
2) What is your goal of your website?
The goal of theFastWater.com from day one (which was last Tuesday I believe) was to allow fans to rank teams based on virtual dual meet match-ups. Simply put, to give fans the opportunity to create their own NCAA dual meet poll. Since day one, I've added some other functions, most notably the virtual NCAA meet. In general, theFastWater.com has evolved, and will continue evolving, into a site aimed at providing many different methods to rank the best swimming that the NCAA has to offer.
3) How do you feel swimming rankings (college and professional) compare to other sports?
Let's start with college. There are at least two different types of college sports: those that base their post-season on regular season rankings, and those that don't. As examples, I'd include football, basketball, and field hockey in the first group. In the second, I'd place sports like swimming and diving, track and field, and cross country.
In season rankings hold a very important and influential position in the first category. Indeed, it is the regular season rankings that dictate which teams will have a chance to compete for the NCAA title. For that reason, coaches need to balance hard training with the need for peak performance all of the time.
Swimming is different. Swimming is a sport that revolves around 2 meets per year: the qualification meet (either the conference championship or a mid-season taper meet) and the championship meet (NCAAs). That gives coaches and teams the ability to train at high intensity nearly the whole season long in the hope of swimming very fast at the end. Since different athletes respond to high intensity training differently (or different teams have different training strategies), this genre of sport doesn't lend itself well to in-season rankings; there's too much variability during the regular season. Instead we task the CSCAA to make educated guesses at which teams are the best (caveat: we task them with estimating which teams are the best at dual meets, not how teams will place at the NCAA championship in March).
In short, college swimming rankings don't serve the same end all, be all purpose as other ranking regimes do. I think a similar analysis can be applied to professional sports.
4) Do you think the NCAA meet format could be improved? If so, how could it be improved (adding 50 yard races, exclude diving, etc)?
Separating the swimming from the diving is the only improvement in meet format that I would like to see. Other than that, I love the NCAA championship the way it is now. It's such an exciting meet! It's a perennial showcase of some of the fastest swimmers in the world in a unique team atmosphere that is found nowhere else in the world. The other change I would like to see is allowing more fast swimmers to compete!
I also want to make clear that my characterization of the separation of swimming and diving as an improvement is in no way meant to discount the great respect I have for the NCAA's divers (actually my youngest brother is a diver in high school right now and will be diving in college).
Actually, I think this separation would be an improvement for NCAA diving as well. Then the NCAA diving and swimming championship wouldn't rely so much on the unrelated sport of swimming. Instead, the team with the best divers would win.
5) Do you feel collegiate swimming should have a dual meet championship?
No. A dual meet championship would diminish the quality of swimming overall.
First of all, as mentioned above, we'd have to base the selection criteria on regular season performance, meaning that teams would have to perform very well throughout the season (unless we just let the CSCAA choose the participants, which seems too subjective to me. Though NCAA basketball seems similar . . .).
Second of all, a dual meet championship would create a perverse incentive that would make it difficult to know whether the dual meet champion was actually the best team. If the 8th ranked team fully tapers for its match up with the top ranked team, and beats them because the top ranked team hasn't tapered, the top team would never have the chance to swim their fastest. The 8th ranked team, though they would make it further in the tournament, would be hard pressed to swim as fast towards the final dual meets.
There are possible variations on a dual meet championship that might be fun to watch (perhaps just take one dual meet at the end of the season between the two top ranked teams), but I don't think a tournament style dual meet championship would work very well.
6) Do you feel the current CSCAA does a poor job with current rankings? If so, how can they improve the rankings?
The CSCAA does a fine job with their dual meet poll. It isn't meant to predict the outcome of NCAAs and doesn't do that. I think we can generally agree that the ordering of teams is accurate. There may be some quibling over whether Cal, Stanford, Texas, or Auburn should be in the top spot, but most of us can agree that those teams are four of the top 6 or so teams in the country. I'd say that's the sign of a pretty good poll.
If the swimming community had the desire, I'm sure a more statistical method of ranking could be developed that took into account how teams have historically improved at the end of the season, at what phase of training teams are, etc. but I'm not sure that it's worth it. At the end of the day, we'll know who the best team is: the NCAA champion.
7) What projects are you working on now or should we anticipate in the future?
Ooo, that's top secret! Well, at least some of it is. What you can count on is that I will continue to try to perfect theFastWater.com (in fact I've just added women's data to the site). I'll also let the readers know that they can look forward to a fantasy NCAA championship this coming March. I hope you'll all participate!
Thanks Justin