Evidence-based coaching is a hot topic around sports. However, balancing evidence and actuality is difficult. Many coaches fall into one category, evidence-based or results-based. Unfortunately, a balance is essential for maximal success and progression of sport.
Many of those fearing evidence are unable to comprehend or adequately review articles. This is not a knock at coaches, but we are currently in the information overload era. It is difficult to siphon through the garbage and find useful, pertinent, trustworthy information. Also, research articles do not always tell the story. These pieces are peer-reviewed leading to miscalculated human error. These reviewers do the best they can, but it is impossible to know every research article on the Earth and disregard every bit of false information, especially when many researchers’ post articles with monetary or credential on the line (promotions, tenure, dissertations, etc.).
On the other hand, many of those evidence-base coaches commonly fall behind the curve as elite athletes and coaches are always ahead of research. This isn't because researcher's are dumb, but research takes time. Whether it is time to pass through the review board or simply time to do the methods, it takes more time a case study a coach is able to perform.
Finding a balance is a must, but first it is essential to know the different types of research, how to find this research, and how to review a scientific article.
Common Types of Research
Experimental Reports: This is the form of research in which a research, typically at a university or company, idea is trialed and tested. This form of research is typically controlled trying to find direct cause and effect, but is a microcosm for life. An example of an experimental report is trying to see if creatine ingestion improves a 50-meter sprint, compared not taking creatine.
Case Studies: A researcher, medical professional, or anyone else keeps track of one client/patient which has improved with a form of implementation. This form of research is quicker than experimental reports, but only gives results on one person. This one person is unique and received unique opportunities which are unable to extrapolate to everyone.
Surveys: Surveys are a means to collect a lot of data on a large population. Unfortunately, these results are not controlled and the results are questionable due to what the person does outside of the study. An example of this is the Farmingham Heart study, where surveys are being given to a population over an extended period to track heart disease over time.
Theory Papers: These papers are as they sound, it is a research discussing a theory they have on a particular subject. Typically these theory papers are based on anecdotal results or a case study. Most often this theory is based on science, but is not supported by hard research.
Reviews: Large reviews bring all the information on a topic together. There are different types of reviews, one is systematic review which takes a look at all the databases and finds information on a topic. Typically, these reviews attempt to exclude poor research and draw conclusions based on all the studies.
Position Papers: Large organizations like to state their opinions. These large organizations do this in the form of a position paper. For example, if swim coaches believed swimmers should breathe every 3, then ASCA could release a position paper, supporting their case for breathing every 3.
Conclusion
The best coaches are able to process new research and adapt it to their training program as well as confirm/refute any research in surrounding their anecdotal evidence. This ability enhances the sport. Stay tuned for part II and sign-up for the Swimming Research Review and receive reviews of all the new research on swimming for only $10/month. June issue is schedule for release June 15.
By G. John Mullen founder of the Center of Optimal Restoration, head strength coach at Santa Clara Swim Club, and creator the Swimmer's Shoulder System.
Many of those fearing evidence are unable to comprehend or adequately review articles. This is not a knock at coaches, but we are currently in the information overload era. It is difficult to siphon through the garbage and find useful, pertinent, trustworthy information. Also, research articles do not always tell the story. These pieces are peer-reviewed leading to miscalculated human error. These reviewers do the best they can, but it is impossible to know every research article on the Earth and disregard every bit of false information, especially when many researchers’ post articles with monetary or credential on the line (promotions, tenure, dissertations, etc.).
On the other hand, many of those evidence-base coaches commonly fall behind the curve as elite athletes and coaches are always ahead of research. This isn't because researcher's are dumb, but research takes time. Whether it is time to pass through the review board or simply time to do the methods, it takes more time a case study a coach is able to perform.
Finding a balance is a must, but first it is essential to know the different types of research, how to find this research, and how to review a scientific article.
Common Types of Research
Experimental Reports: This is the form of research in which a research, typically at a university or company, idea is trialed and tested. This form of research is typically controlled trying to find direct cause and effect, but is a microcosm for life. An example of an experimental report is trying to see if creatine ingestion improves a 50-meter sprint, compared not taking creatine.
Case Studies: A researcher, medical professional, or anyone else keeps track of one client/patient which has improved with a form of implementation. This form of research is quicker than experimental reports, but only gives results on one person. This one person is unique and received unique opportunities which are unable to extrapolate to everyone.
Surveys: Surveys are a means to collect a lot of data on a large population. Unfortunately, these results are not controlled and the results are questionable due to what the person does outside of the study. An example of this is the Farmingham Heart study, where surveys are being given to a population over an extended period to track heart disease over time.
Theory Papers: These papers are as they sound, it is a research discussing a theory they have on a particular subject. Typically these theory papers are based on anecdotal results or a case study. Most often this theory is based on science, but is not supported by hard research.
Reviews: Large reviews bring all the information on a topic together. There are different types of reviews, one is systematic review which takes a look at all the databases and finds information on a topic. Typically, these reviews attempt to exclude poor research and draw conclusions based on all the studies.
Position Papers: Large organizations like to state their opinions. These large organizations do this in the form of a position paper. For example, if swim coaches believed swimmers should breathe every 3, then ASCA could release a position paper, supporting their case for breathing every 3.
Conclusion
The best coaches are able to process new research and adapt it to their training program as well as confirm/refute any research in surrounding their anecdotal evidence. This ability enhances the sport. Stay tuned for part II and sign-up for the Swimming Research Review and receive reviews of all the new research on swimming for only $10/month. June issue is schedule for release June 15.
By G. John Mullen founder of the Center of Optimal Restoration, head strength coach at Santa Clara Swim Club, and creator the Swimmer's Shoulder System.





