close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20220314171741/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137355621_19

Advertisement

Eliot Freidson: Sociological Narratives of Professionalism and Modern Medicine

Chapter

Abstract

Theoretical analyses in sociological specialist areas such as health and illness are believed to be led by theorising from mainstream sociological thinking. However, in some cases the reverse is evident, such as in the sociology of professionalism, where considerable debate has focused on the changing position of medicine and doctors, which has been characterised by some scholars as the archetype of professionalism. There have been a multitude of theoretical perspectives informing sociological analysis of this topic, but one of the most influential has been the writings of Eliot Freidson, who has been described (Bosk 2006:637) as ‘a founding figure in medical sociology’. This chapter will focus on discussion of some of Freidson’s key concepts which appeared in his earlier work, such as professional autonomy (Freidson 1970, 1975), and more latterly, re-stratification, and in his more recent writings, where Freidson (2001) argued that professionalism is an ideal type of organisation of work (or what he termed ‘a third logic’), where the professional acts as a mediator presiding over the interests of the state or corporate agencies and serving the needs of the public and demands of patients. Freidson was not without his critics (Coburn 2006), and the chapter will examine the merits of some of these critiques. It will also draw on empirical evidence mainly from the National Health Service (NHS), in England, to examine if concepts such as professional autonomy and discretion, re-stratification and trust are salient in sociological explanations of the current position of medicine.

Keywords

National Health Service Medical Profession Ideal Type Professional Autonomy Sociological Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alford, R. (1975) Health Care Politics. Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  2. Bosk, C.L. (2006) ‘Review Essay: Avoiding Conventional Understandings: The Enduring Legacy of Eliot Freidson’ Sociology of Health and Illness 28:637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calnan, M. (1982) ‘The Hospital Accident and Emergency Department; What Is Its Role?’ Journal of Social Policy 11:483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calnan, M. and Gabe, J. (1991) ‘Recent Developments in General Practice? A Sociological Analysis’ in Gabe, J.; Calnan, M. and Bury, M. (eds.) The Sociology of the Health Service. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  5. Calnan, M. and Gabe, J. (2009) ‘The Re-Stratification of Primary Care in England? A Sociological Analysis’ in Gabe, J. and Calnan, M. (eds.) The New Sociology of the Health Service. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  6. Calnan, M. and Rowe, R. (2008) Trust Matters in Health Care. Open University Press: Maidenhead.Google Scholar
  7. Carr-Saunders, A.M. and Wilson, P.A. (1933) The Professions. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
  8. Checkland, K. (2004) ‘National Service Frameworks and UK General Practitioners’ Sociology of Health and Illness 26(7):951–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheraghi-Sohi, S.S. and Calnan, M. (2013) ‘Discretion or Discretions? Delineating Professional Discretion in English Medical Practice’ Social Science and Medicine 96:52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobum, D. (2006) ‘Medical Dominance Then and Now: Critical Reflections’ Health Sociology Review 15 (5):433–443.Google Scholar
  11. Coburn, D.; Rappolt, S. and Bourgeault, I. (1997) ‘Decline vs. Retention of Medical Power Through Restratification: An Examination of the Ontario Case’ Sociology of Health and Illness 19:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collyer, F.M. (2010) ‘Origins and Canons: Medicine and the History of Sociology’ History of the Human Sciences 23(2):86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dent, M. (2006) ‘Disciplining the Medical Profession? Implications of Patient Choice for Medical Dominance’ Health Sociology Review 15(5):458-4ó8.Google Scholar
  14. Elston, MA. (1991) “The Politics of Professional Power: Medicine in a Changing Health Service’ in Gabe, J.; Calnan, M. and Bury, M. (eds.) The Sociology of the Health Service. Routledge: London, pp. 58–88.Google Scholar
  15. Elston, MA. and Gabe, J. (2013) ‘Medical Autonomy, Dominance and Decline’ in Gabe, J. and Monaghan L. (eds.) Key Concepts in Medical Sociology. Sage: London, Part 4. pp. 151–155.Google Scholar
  16. Evetts, J. (2002) ‘New Directions in State and International Professional Occupations: Discretionary Decision-Making and Acquired Regulation’ Work, Employment and Society 16(2):341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evetts, J. (2006) ‘The Sociology of Professional Groups: New Directions’ Current Sociology 54(1):133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freidson, E. (1970) Professional Dominance. Atherton Press: New York.Google Scholar
  19. Freidson, E. (1975) The Profession of Medicine. Dodd and Mead: New York.Google Scholar
  20. Freidson, E. (1994) Professionalism Reborn: Theory Prophecy and Policy. Polity Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Freidson, E. (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Polity: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Gabe, J. and Calnan, M. (eds.) (2009) The New Sociology of the Health Service. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  23. Halpern, S. and Anspach, R. (1993) ‘The Study of Medical Institutions: Eliot Freidson’s Legacy’ Work and Occupations 20(3):279-295Google Scholar
  24. Hanison, S. (2009) ‘Co-option, Commodification and the Medical Model: Governing UK Medicine since 1991’ Public Administration 87(2): 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanison, S. and Ahmad, W. (2002) ‘Medical Autonomy and the UK State 1975 to 2005’ in Nettleton, S. and Gustaffson, U. (eds.) The Sociology of Health and Illness Reader. Polity: London.Google Scholar
  26. Haug, M. (1973) ‘Deprofessionalisation: An Alternative Hypothesis for the Future’ Sociological Review Monograph 2:195–211.Google Scholar
  27. Horowitz, R. (2013) In the Public Interest: Medical Licensing and the Disciplinary Process. Rutgers University Press: London.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, T. (1977) “The Professions in the Class Structure’ in Scase, R. (ed.) Industrial Society: Class Cleavage and Control. Allen and Unwin: London.Google Scholar
  29. Kelleher, D.; Gabe, J. and Williams, G. (eds.) (2006) Challenging Medicine. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  30. Kuhlmann, E. (2006) ‘Traces of Doubt and Sources of Trust: Health Professions in an Uncertain Society’ Current Sociology 54(4):607–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuhlmann, E. (2008) ‘Governing Beyond Markets and Managerialism: Professions as Mediators’ in Kuhlmann, E. and Saks, M. (eds.) Rethinking Professional Governance: International Directions in Healthcare. The Policy Press: Bristol, pp. 45–60.Google Scholar
  32. Larson, M. (1978) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. California University Press: Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  33. Larson, M. (2003) ‘Professionalism: The Third Logic’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46(3):458–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Light, D. (2010) ‘Healthcare Professions, Markets and Countervailing Powers’ in Bird, C.; Conrad, P.; Fremont, A. and Timmermans, S. (eds.) Handbook of Medical Sociology. Sixth edition. The Vanderbilt University Press: Nashville.Google Scholar
  35. McDonald, R.; Checkland, K. and Harrison, S. (2009) ‘The New GP Contract in English Primary Health Care: An Ethnographic Study’ International journal of Public Sector Management 22(1):21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McKinlay, J. (1977) “The Business of Good Doctoring or Doctoring as Good Business: Reflections on Freidson’s View of the Medical Game’ International Journal of Health Services 7(3):459–488. See also in the same edition of the journal a comment in response by Freidson (pp. 485–486) and further rejoinder by McKinlay J (pp. 487–488).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McKinlay, J. and Arches, J. (1985) ‘Toward the Proletarianisation of Physicians’ International Journal of Health Services 15(2):161–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKinlay, J. and Marceau, L. (2002) ‘The End of the Golden Age of Doctoring’ International Journal of Health Services 32:379–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan, M.; Calnan, M. and Manning, N. (1985) Sociological Approaches to Health and Medicine. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  40. Navarro, V. (1976) Medicine Under Capitalism. Prodist: New York.Google Scholar
  41. Navarro, V. (1988) ‘Professional Dominance or Proletarianization? Neither’ Milbank Memorial Quarterly 66(2):57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nettleton, S. (2013) The Sociology of Health and Illness. Polity: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  43. Nettleton, S.; Burrows, R. and O’Malley, L. (2005) ‘The Mundane Realities of the Everyday Use of the Internet for Health and Their Consequences for Media Convergence’ Sociology of Health and Illness 25 (6):5 89–60 7.Google Scholar
  44. Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  45. Pollock, A. and Price, D. (2011) “The Final Frontier: The UKs New Coalition Government Turns the English National Health Service over to the Global Health Care Market’ Health Sociology Review 20(3):294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spyridonidis, D. and Calnan, M. (2011) ‘Are New Forms of Professionalism Emerging in Medicine? The Case of the Implementation of NICE Guidelines’ Health Sociology Review 20(4):394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Timmermans, S. (2008) ‘Professions and Their Work: Do Market Shelters Protect Professional Interests?’ Work and Occupations 35(2): 164–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Willis, E. (2006) ‘Introduction: Taking Stock of Medical Dominance’ Health Sociology Review 15(5):421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Witz, A. (1992) Professions and Patriarchy. Routledge: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael Calnan 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KentUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options