The introduction of stable isotopes in archaeological research beginning in the 1970s produced a revolution in the ways that several key anthropological issues were studied, including early hominin subsistence, hunter-gatherer spatial...
moreThe introduction of stable isotopes in archaeological research beginning in the 1970s produced a revolution in the ways that several key anthropological issues were studied, including early hominin subsistence, hunter-gatherer spatial organization, origins and history of farming and pastoralist societies, migrations, and intra- and inter-group social differentiation. As a tool suited for the quantitative reconstruction of paleodiets, bone chemistry provided a new and independent line of evidence that was readily integrated into ongoing discussions based on archaeofaunal and paleobotanical data (see van der Merwe, 1982; Ambrose, 1993). The impact that isotopic research has had in the field of archaeology is reflected in the ever-growing number of publications making use of isotopic analyses, and in the also growing number of volumes directed towards the integration of available results and perspectives of analysis (Sillen & Armelagos, 1991; Sandford, 1993; Bocherens et al., 1999; Ambrose & Katzenberg, 2000; Ambrose & Krigbaum, 2003; Koch & Burton, 2003; Staller et al., 2007).
The archaeology of South America was part of this process, presenting some early and excellent examples of isotopic research focused on the resolution of archaeological problems (e.g. Hastorf & De Niro, 1985; Burger & van der Merwe, 1990; Ubelaker, et al., 1995). However, most of the abundant research conducted during the last two decades below 20° S of latitude is not well represented in the international archaeological literature (although see Fernández et al., 1999; Gil, 2003; Yesner et al., 2003; Falabella et al., 2008). In this context, one of the main goals of this volume is to provide an updated review of the isotopic research conducted in southern South America, including cases from the Bolivian and Argentinean Puna or “Altiplano”, northwestern Argentina, the central-western Andean region of Argentina, the Pampas, Patagonia, and the Atlantic and Pacific marine coastlines. This set of papers is the product of a Workshop named “Arqueología e Isótopos Estables en el Sur de Sudamérica: Discusión e Integración de Resultados” that was held in the city of Malargüe (Mendoza province, Argentina) in 2005. This workshop was organized in the memory of Susana Valencio, a geochemistry researcher who had a substantial role in the introduction of stable isotopes in Argentinean archaeology, and who died unexpectedly in 2004, leaving a great void among her many friends and colleagues.
Current lines of research
Food availability, preparation, and consumption are basic parts of ancient societies. This volume is focused on the southern cone of South America, where both agriculturalists and hunter-gatherers existed into modern times, and where stable isotope analysis has been widely used in recent times. Foremost is work related with the development of stronger approaches to regional isotopic ecology (Llano; Yacobaccio et al.), methodological aspects regarding the application of stable isotopes to the reconstruction of subsistence and migrations (Tykot et al.; Knudson), introduction and impact of agriculture on Andean societies (Calo & Cortés; Gil et al.; Laguens et al.), adoption of pastoralist economies (Izeta et al.), spatial organization and territoriality of hunter-gatherer groups from the Pampas and Patagonia (Berón et al.; Borrero et al.; Martínez et al.; Tessone et al.), and integration of isotopic and bioarchaeological data (Suby & Guichón). Overall, the systematic use of stable isotopes in archaeological research in South America has fostered a reevaluation of some widely held views regarding, among other important subjects, the importance of maize in Andean societies and the amplitude of hunter-gatherer home ranges.
Research conducted from South America usually has to cope with strong budget restrictions that may impose limits in the size of the available isotopic sample. This has been variously tackled by developing long-term projects that allow gradual increases in the amount of information produced, or by integrating international research teams that provide external funding sources. Both strategies are represented in this volume. We believe that an exploratory framework of research provides the most productive strategy – in this or any other academic context – where specific questions are pursued even when we know that the factual basis is far from ideal. The key aspect is to be sensitive to the paths that need to be followed in order to identify stronger patterns and suggest more accurate explanations. We are confident that the set of fourteen papers that make up this volume is successful in presenting original strategies to cope with old problems, as well as in raising questions not foreseen.
A main concern shared by these papers is the integration of isotopic data with other lines of evidence, including archaeofaunal studies, health conditions and paleopathology as inferred from human remains, lithic distributions, paleobotany, and mortuary practices. This is an important virtue that generates the need to evaluate several theoretical and methodological levels in order to integrate data differing in terms of units of analysis, resolution, and formation history. This task broadens the spectrum of the discussions developed, making them valuable beyond the limits of stable isotopic research and transcending the geographical scope of South America.