Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20250219191221/https://github.blog/changelog/2025-02-19-new-gpt-4o-copilot-code-completion-model-now-available-for-copilot-in-jetbrains-ides/
The new code completion model announced yesterday is available today to all JetBrains users of GitHub Copilot.
To get started, ensure that you are on the latest stable release of the extension (v1.5.35 or above). Click the Copilot icon in the JetBrains IDE of your choice and select Edit model for Completion. This will open the GitHub Copilot settings, where you can switch between models.
There are new search and filtering options for custom properties now generally available to ensure you can easily find the right property.
Managed by allows you to limit your result by the organization or enterprise who manages the property.
Property type allows you to limit your result by the available type of properties.
Text allows you to limit your result by the context of the property name or values.
Enterprise custom properties
Enterprise custom properties as part of the current preview can now be promoted from an organization to an enterprise property. This ensures properties configured in one organization are available across all organizations in an enterprise.
Enterprise code rulesets
Required workflows are now available as a new rule in the enterprise code rulespreview. This will allow you to target workflows across specific organizations and repositories with a single workflow file managed at the enterprise.
We released a collection of improvements to Artifact Attestations to make the verification of attestations easier and more consistent.
Artifact Attestations let you create provenance signatures, which provide an unforgeable paper trail that links your artifact back to its originating workflow run. By verifying the signature, you can gate deployments to ensure that what you deploy is exactly what you built, guaranteeing that the artifact has not been tampered with.
Today we are announcing multiple improvements based on the user feedback we have received:
Attestation verification defaults to build provenance: Build provenance is just one type of information that can be attested to an artifact. It provides a verifiable trail that links the artifact back to its originating workflow run, ensuring its authenticity and integrity. However, other types of information can also be attested to an artifact, for example a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). Attestations can be verified by running gh attestation verify using the GitHub CLI. Previously, verification succeeded as soon as there was any attestation associated with the artifact. However, we observed that provenance is verified in the vast majority of cases. Therefore, we altered the CLI to default to provenance when no predicate type is specified. This change ensures that verification does not pass merely because, for example, an SBOM was attested to the artifact. To verify an SBOM, the predicate type must be explicitly supplied as a parameter using gh attestation verify with the --predicate-type parameter.
CLI outputs evaluated policies during verification: When verifying an attestation, the CLI now outputs all the policies it evaluated to determine whether the verification succeeds or fails. This increases transparency, making it easier to understand the reasons behind the verification outcome.
Attestation verification is now monotonic: This means that once verification passes for an artifact, the addition of another attestation cannot change that status. Verification now succeeds if at least one attestation passes verification. This ensures that downstream processes, such as gated deployments, are not affected for any legitimate build that has a valid provenance attestation, even if someone adds another attestation that is bad or malformed.